Defamer.com makes the Decent Community want to pick our collective butts and eat it. God damn it! Initially we wanted to call out a non celeb-based blog, but on our never ending avoidance of indecency this blog smashed us in the face like a Jerod Mayo tackle, that we had to write about it.
Defamer.com is one blog in a network of media blogs with the same diarrhea based content. What makes Defamer indecent is not necessarily its celeb-specific content — we have come to accept the popularity of pop culture blogs, but its overall content. If you are gonna write about celebs then write about celebs — so be it, but when your content jumps back and forth from politics to pop culture you lose a bit of credibility in our eyes. The problem with Defamer is just that, a lack of credibility.
Can you responsibly write about pop culture and politics? We don’t think soo. Not without humor or satire. Defamer attempts to take both pop culture and politics seriously. Writing one post about Sarah Palin and the next about David Duchovny’s sex addiction. Again, credibility is the issue.
If you’re gonna write about something as serious as Double D’s infatuation with sex, please do it responsibly and without bias! Why is DD’s sex addiction any more flagrant than any man’s sex addiction? For Christ sakes, doesn’t every man walking this planet have a sex addiction. Ignorant little kids read the Defamer and assume it’s credible. Thanks to the Defamer little boys and girls alike think sex is an addiction, and more importantly, that Dave Duchovny has a problem! Write about politics all you want, but when you start calling out The Dook, the Master of the Unknown, Decent Community has problem. Decent Community suggestion to Defamer.com is to narrow down their content, which will increase their credibility, and to lay off the excessive boning lifestyles of the rich and famous that we all strive to attain.
Filed under: indecent blogs, politics, questions, romance, style








